Google renders your JavaScript. ChatGPT, Perplexity and Claude don't: they read raw HTML. A page can rank beautifully and still be invisible to every AI answer at the same time. As an AI page audit tool built specifically for AEO and GEO, we show you which, and why, then exactly what to fix, ranked by impact, whether you're checking one page or running a full AI site audit across your key templates.
Your first check is free · Results in ~20 seconds
"Can a crawler reach this page at all" and "how good is this page for an AI answer" are different questions with different fixes. Both are one login away.
Fetch any URL as Googlebot, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot and Google AI, desktop and mobile, see exactly what each one can and can’t read, element by element.
Open LLM Access Check →A weighted score built from the same checklist across every tab, content, indexability, keyword match, with ranked, page-specific fixes, not a generic checklist.
Open Full AEO & GEO Audit →Every check we run, and why it affects whether an AI engine cites the page, published openly so you know exactly what "the score" means.
Open The AEO & GEO Checklist →Header, navigation, main content, footer, images, schema, each one checked separately, by page region and by content type. If your nav is JavaScript-rendered and invisible to GPTBot, that's the line that tells you, not a vague overall score.
No published or modified date in the markup.
Answer engines prefer sources they can date, and heavily discount undated pages on anything time-sensitive.
Every failed check comes with a plain-English reason it affects AI citation, and a concrete fix, not "structured data: 45/100" with no idea what to actually change.
See the full checklist and why each check matters →This AEO & GEO tool needs no install and no tag on your site, and there's no waiting for a crawl. Paste a URL and read the answer.
Your page, a client's page, or a competitor's. Nothing to install and no access to their site required, we fetch it the same way the crawlers do.
Googlebot, GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and Bingbot, each with its real user-agent, paced so we never trip the site's rate limiter.
Element by element: what each crawler received, what it missed, and a ranked list of what to change first. Export it as a PDF and hand it to a client.
Every check the tool runs, grouped by page type and vertical, with the reasoning behind each one.
Browse the checklist →Plain-English definitions for the terms that come up in every report, answerability, entity clarity, citation likelihood and more.
Read the glossary →Practical guides on getting cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Overviews, not vague theory.
Read the blog →New research found only 11% overlap between which sites ChatGPT and Perplexity cite. Here's why, and what it means for your strategy.
Read →Google is adding more links inside AI Mode, plus short notes on why each one matters. Here's what that means if you want to get cited.
Read →Backlinks correlate with AI citations at r=0.22. Brand mentions correlate at r=0.66. Here's what that gap actually means.
Read →Googlebot renders JavaScript. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot mostly don’t, they read the raw HTML response. Content injected by JavaScript is invisible to them even though Google sees it fine.
Every pillar score is built from the same named checklist shown on the report’s Content, Indexability and Keywords tabs, not a separate black-box number. See the full checklist at /checklist.
No. Paste a URL and we fetch it the same way the crawlers do. Nothing to install, no tag, no waiting for a crawl.
Both. Run it against a single URL for a page-level AEO audit, or work through your key templates (home, product, article) one by one for a practical AI site audit, since AI crawlers can treat pages on the same site very differently depending on how each template renders.
Both, in one audit. AEO and GEO overlap almost completely in practice, so we don’t split them into two separate reports. The same checklist covers the AEO fundamentals (structured data, direct answers, crawlability) and the GEO-specific factors research has shown move citation rate, like naming and linking your sources, and using concrete numbers instead of vague claims, plus a per-engine citation-likelihood estimate for ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and AI Overviews.
One check takes about 20 seconds. The first one is on us.